Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Formulation and Evaluation of Two-Pulse Drug Delivery System of Amoxicillin Trihydrate

Rohitash Kumar, MS Anvesh, Mohammed S Khan, Afrasim Moin , DV Gowda

Department of Pharmaceutics, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS University, SS Nagar, Mysore - 570015 Karnataka;

For correspondence:-  Afrasim Moin   Email: afrasimmoin@yahoo.co.in

Received: 6 September 2013        Accepted: 19 August 2014        Published: 19 October 2014

Citation: Kumar R, Anvesh M, Khan MS, Moin A, Gowda D. Formulation and Evaluation of Two-Pulse Drug Delivery System of Amoxicillin Trihydrate. Trop J Pharm Res 2014; 13(10):1593-1600 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v13i10.4

© 2014 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a pH-controlled two-pulse drug delivery system of amoxicillin in order to overcome the snag of biological tolerance and to improve bactericidal activity.
Methods: The core tablets were compressed and coated with hydroxylpropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) of different viscosities with spray-dried lactose (SDL) as a pore former. The final two-pulse release tablet was prepared with the remaining drug fraction (to be released as the first immediate release pulse) with a disintegrant, giving the final tablet. The tablets were evaluated for pharmaceutical properties including disintegration, thickness, hardness, friability and weight variation and by DSC (differential scanning calorimetry) and FTIR (Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy) studies in order to assess drug/polymer compatibility. The tablets further subjected to in vitro dissolution studies  and stability studies.
Result: The tablet core disintegrated within 30 to 40 s. Drug content ranged from 97.85  to 98.23 %. FTIR and DSC studies showed drug-polymer compatibility. The developed two-pulse release tablets had acceptable thickness, hardness, friability and weight variation. In vitro drug release showed prolongation of lag time as polymer viscosity increased. With 25 % HPMC and 75 % SDL, drug release was 97.5 % by the end of 8th , 9th &10th h and viscosity was 100, 400 and 4000 cps respectively. No significant difference in drug release was found as values were within limits of confidence interval (p < 0.05). The formulation was stable.
Conclusion: The developed formulation demonstrates the feasibility of a two-phase release of amoxicillin separated by a well-defined time-controlled lag phase which is desirable for chronotherapeutic drug delivery.

Keywords: Two-pulse drug delivery, Chronotherapeutic drug delivery, Bacterial drug resistance, Amoxicillin

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates